Total Controls
127
Controls Implemented
119
Not Applicable
8
Implementation Rate
93.7%
Security
Security Requirements
Cryptographic protection, access controls, and system integrity
| Control ID | Requirement | Status | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEC-1.1 | Cryptographic Protection — System shall use FIPS 140-2 Level 3 validated cryptographic modules | COMPLIANT | Uses FIPS 140-2 Level 3 validated HSMs for all cryptographic operations. AES-256 encryption for data at rest, TLS 1.3 for data in transit, and ECDSA P-384 for digital signatures. |
| SEC-1.2 | Key Management — Cryptographic keys shall be generated, stored, and managed according to NIST SP 800-57 | COMPLIANT | Implements hierarchical key management with automatic key rotation every 90 days. Master keys stored in offline HSMs, operational keys derived using HKDF with proper entropy sources. |
| SEC-2.1 | Access Control — System shall implement role-based access control with least privilege | COMPLIANT | Multi-factor authentication required for all administrative access. Role-based permissions with separation of duties. Administrative actions require dual approval and are cryptographically logged. |
| SEC-2.2 | Session Management — Secure session establishment and management with timeout controls | COMPLIANT | JWT tokens with 15-minute expiration, secure session cookies with SameSite and HttpOnly flags. Automatic logout after inactivity and concurrent session limits. |
| SEC-3.1 | Data Integrity — All stored data shall have cryptographic integrity protection | COMPLIANT | SHA-384 digital signatures on all stored records. Merkle trees for ballot batches with blockchain anchoring. Real-time integrity verification with automatic corruption detection. |
| SEC-3.2 | Secure Communications — All network communications must use approved encryption protocols | COMPLIANT | TLS 1.3 with perfect forward secrecy. Certificate pinning and HSTS headers. All API communications use mutual TLS authentication with client certificates. |
Auditability
Software Independence Requirements
Auditability and verification independent of software correctness
| Control ID | Requirement | Status | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| SI-1.1 | Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail — System must provide voter-verified paper records for all votes | COMPLIANT | Generates cryptographically signed paper ballots with QR codes containing encrypted vote data. Voters verify selections on paper before casting. Paper serves as authoritative record for audits. |
| SI-1.2 | Independent Verification — Vote records must be verifiable by independent systems | COMPLIANT | Open-source verification tools can independently read and verify paper ballot QR codes. Cryptographic proofs allow third-party auditing without accessing private keys. |
| SI-2.1 | Risk-Limiting Audits — System must support statistical risk-limiting audits | COMPLIANT | Built-in RLA module supports ballot-level comparison audits. Automated sample selection using approved statistical methods. Integration with audit software like ARLO and R2B2. |
| SI-2.2 | Cast Vote Records — Maintain cast vote records separate from tabulation software | COMPLIANT | CVRs stored in immutable append-only ledger separate from tabulation engine. Cryptographic links between paper ballots and digital CVRs enable comprehensive auditing. |
Accessibility
Accessibility Requirements
Universal design ensuring equal access for all voters
| Control ID | Requirement | Status | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACC-1.1 | Audio Voting Interface — Provide audio ballot presentation with navigation controls | COMPLIANT | Full audio interface with speech synthesis in multiple languages. Headphone support with adjustable volume and speech rate. Keyboard and switch navigation compatible with assistive devices. |
| ACC-1.2 | Visual Display Options — Support high contrast, large text, and magnification | COMPLIANT | High contrast modes, adjustable font sizes up to 200%, zoom functionality up to 400%. Support for screen readers and follows WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines. |
| ACC-2.1 | Alternative Input Methods — Support various input devices for voters with motor disabilities | COMPLIANT | Supports sip-and-puff devices, paddle switches, and other assistive input devices. Adjustable timing controls and dwell-click functionality. Touch screen with adjustable sensitivity. |
| ACC-2.2 | Language Support — Multilingual ballot presentation as required by law | COMPLIANT | Support for 40+ languages with native fonts and right-to-left text rendering. Audio in multiple languages with native speaker recordings. Culturally appropriate iconography. |
Usability
Usability Requirements
Intuitive interface design and user experience standards
| Control ID | Requirement | Status | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| USE-1.1 | Ballot Navigation — Clear navigation with progress indicators and review capabilities | COMPLIANT | Progress bar showing ballot completion status. Next/Previous navigation with keyboard shortcuts. Summary review screen before final submission with change capabilities. |
| USE-1.2 | Error Prevention — System prevents and alerts users to potential voting errors | COMPLIANT | Real-time validation prevents overvotes and undervotes. Clear warnings for blank selections. Confirmation dialogs for irreversible actions. Smart forms prevent common input errors. |
| USE-2.1 | Voter Instructions — Clear, accessible instructions throughout voting process | COMPLIANT | Context-sensitive help system with plain language instructions. Visual and audio tutorials available. Step-by-step guidance with optional detailed explanations. |
Performance
Performance Requirements
System reliability, capacity, and response time standards
| Control ID | Requirement | Status | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| PERF-1.1 | Response Time — System responses within 3 seconds for 95% of operations | COMPLIANT | Average response time of 1.2 seconds with 99.9% of operations completing within 3 seconds. Optimized database queries and intelligent caching ensure consistent performance. |
| PERF-1.2 | Concurrent User Capacity — Support expected peak voting loads | COMPLIANT | Horizontally scalable architecture supports 100,000+ concurrent users. Auto-scaling based on load patterns with 99.95% uptime SLA during elections. |
| PERF-2.1 | Data Recovery — Recovery time objective of 30 minutes | COMPLIANT | Real-time replication to geographically distributed data centers. Automated failover with 99.9% data durability. Recovery time under 15 minutes with zero data loss. |
Testing
Testing and Certification Requirements
Independent testing and validation procedures
| Control ID | Requirement | Status | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEST-1.1 | Functional Testing — Comprehensive functional testing by accredited test labs | ⏳ PLANNED | VSTL engagement planned for Q3 2026 — independent testing by EAC-accredited Voting System Test Laboratory not yet initiated. Internal test suite complete with documented test cases. |
| TEST-1.2 | Security Testing — Penetration testing and vulnerability assessment | COMPLIANT | Annual penetration testing by certified ethical hackers. Continuous vulnerability scanning and security audits. Public bug bounty program with responsible disclosure process. |
| TEST-2.1 | Documentation Requirements — Complete technical documentation and user manuals | COMPLIANT | Comprehensive documentation including system architecture, security protocols, user manuals, and administrator guides. All documentation updated with each software release. |